Risk Management
Sequence-of-Returns Risk: The Retirement Danger Few People Plan For
Average return is the number most people focus on. In retirement, the order those returns arrive in can matter just as much.
The core problem
Two portfolios can average the same 8% annual return over 20 years and finish decades apart in value - purely because of when the down years happened.
Illustrative only. Actual outcomes depend on drawdown rate, fees, asset allocation, and market conditions specific to your plan.
Why this matters more in retirement
While you are working and contributing, a market downturn is largely a paper loss - you keep buying units at lower prices and the eventual recovery works in your favour. The moment you start withdrawing an income instead of contributing one, that relationship flips.
Every withdrawal made during a downturn locks in a loss that can no longer recover. The capital base shrinks faster than the market alone would explain, and future withdrawals - even unchanged in size - represent a larger share of what is left.
What actually drives the risk
Withdrawal rate meets a falling market
Drawing a fixed rand amount or fixed percentage from a shrinking pool means you sell more units to raise the same income - permanently reducing the capital left to recover when markets turn.
Timing, not just returns, decides the outcome
Two retirees can earn the exact same average return over 20 years and end up in very different positions, purely because of the order in which good and bad years occurred.
Early losses compound the damage
A market decline in year one or two of retirement does more harm than the same decline in year fifteen, because there is less time and less capital left to recover before further withdrawals are needed.
Building a plan that survives a bad first decade
Sequence risk cannot be eliminated - nobody controls when markets fall. It can, however, be planned around. The goal is a structure that does not force you to sell growth assets at the worst possible moment.
A conservative starting drawdown
Sustainable withdrawal rates are generally lower than most people assume, particularly in the first decade of retirement when sequence risk is most dangerous.
A cash and near-cash buffer
Holding one to three years of income needs outside of growth assets means you are not forced to sell equities at depressed prices to fund monthly income.
A blended annuity structure
Combining a guaranteed income for essential expenses with a living annuity for flexibility and legacy reduces how much of your lifestyle depends on market timing.
Flexible spending in bad years
Building in the ability to draw less during a downturn - even temporarily - materially improves the odds the plan lasts as long as you do.
The five years that matter most
The five years before and after your retirement date carry disproportionate weight. This is the window where the portfolio is at its largest, withdrawals are beginning, and there is comparatively little time for a downturn to recover before it affects your income. Reviewing asset allocation and drawdown strategy specifically around this window - rather than leaving it on autopilot - is one of the highest-value planning decisions a pre-retiree can make.
Conclusion
Average returns make for a reassuring headline number, but they are not what pays a retirement income. Structure, drawdown discipline, and a buffer against forced selling in down years are what determine whether a plan holds up when markets do not cooperate on schedule.
The right drawdown rate and asset mix depend on your specific time horizon, other income sources, and risk tolerance - worth stress-testing properly before you commit to a number.
Book a free consultation